![]() Schempp was brought to trial by a religious family who had contacted the ACLU. Second Trial: Schempp won again School District of Abington Township appealed it. Curlett dealt with state-approved reading of Bible passages before classes in public schools. Law changed so students could be excused. Ruling: Under the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, public schools cannot sponsor Bible readings or recitations of the Lord’s Prayer. Laws requiring participation in religious exercises directly violated the First Amendment.īoth Abington School District v.Majority Decision: Justices Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, White, Brennan, and Goldberg.These practices had been challenged by the Schempps, Unitarians from Pennsylvania. 203 (1963), invalidated the reading of verses, without comment, from the Bible and the Lord’s Prayer in public school settings. ![]() ![]() ![]() Key Question: Did a Pennsylvania law requiring public school students to participate in religious exercises violate their religious rights as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments? After completing these readings, school authorities required all Abington Township students to recite the Lords Prayer. It was during Schempps case that the Supreme Court had declared it unconstitutional to hold religious exercises in public schools as well as declared public. The Supreme Court decision in Abington School District v.Petitioner: School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |